Add To Collection
Add to Collection
The dissent of the enclosure
The dissent of the enclosure
Germany
View Original
Add To Collection
Add to Collection
View Original
Add To Collection
Add to Collection
View Original
Add To Collection
Add to Collection
View Original
Add To Collection
Add to Collection
View Original
Add To Collection
Add to Collection
View Original
Add To Collection
Add to Collection
View Original
Add To Collection
Add to Collection
View Original
Add To Collection
Add to Collection
View Original
Add To Collection
Add to Collection
View Original
Add To Collection
Add to Collection
View Original
Add To Collection
Add to Collection
View Original
Add To Collection
Add to Collection
View Original
Add To Collection
Add to Collection
View Original
Add To Collection
Add to Collection
View Original
Add To Collection
Add to Collection
View Original
Add To Collection
Add to Collection
View Original
Add To Collection
Add to Collection
View Original
Add To Collection
Add to Collection
View Original
Add To Collection
Add to Collection
The dissent of the enclosure
Germany
Firm
Type
STATUS
Built
YEAR
2026
SIZE
3000 sqft - 5000 sqft
BUDGET
$1M - 5M
The project is situated on the edge of a former wine estate comprising a 19th-century manor house, limestone boundary walls, and a park traversed by ancient rows of linden trees. The ensemble bore the traces of a domestic architecture based on order, axial symmetry, and the classical hierarchy of spaces. The original composition developed a massive, silent, almost bureaucratic style in its relationship to the ground and materials.
The contemporary intervention employs a strategy of architectural grafting, adding 300 m² laterally to the historic volume. The new structure, made of steel and glass, unfolds a deconstructed morphology composed of prismatic fragments, cantilevers, and metallic folds, producing a constant perceptual instability. The extension acts as a controlled dislocation of the heritage form.
The project explores the notion of conflicting complementarity. The main house retains its mineral tectonic character, its regular rhythm of openings, and its structural thickness, while the extension develops a kinetic logic where reflective surfaces dissolve the traditional volumetric reading. The historical lines of force remain visible, then are progressively absorbed by a contemporary composition based on diffraction, fragmentation, and the deliberate loss of frontality.
Here, steel fulfills both a structural and atmospheric function. The load-bearing elements become perceptual edges contributing to the overall tension of the architectural object. Glass, for its part, introduces a regime of visual porosity in which the park landscape, the vegetation, and the old facades are continually reflected, producing a form of spatial indeterminacy.
The intervention rejects any pastiche logic or any stylistic continuity with the existing heritage. The project embraces a dialectical relationship between legacy and dissonance. The main house becomes a temporal foundation upon which an architecture of accident, torsion, and geometric displacement is deposited. This confrontation generates a new reading of the domain: an architecture where built memory ceases to be fixed and enters a state of permanent transformation.
The contemporary intervention employs a strategy of architectural grafting, adding 300 m² laterally to the historic volume. The new structure, made of steel and glass, unfolds a deconstructed morphology composed of prismatic fragments, cantilevers, and metallic folds, producing a constant perceptual instability. The extension acts as a controlled dislocation of the heritage form.
The project explores the notion of conflicting complementarity. The main house retains its mineral tectonic character, its regular rhythm of openings, and its structural thickness, while the extension develops a kinetic logic where reflective surfaces dissolve the traditional volumetric reading. The historical lines of force remain visible, then are progressively absorbed by a contemporary composition based on diffraction, fragmentation, and the deliberate loss of frontality.
Here, steel fulfills both a structural and atmospheric function. The load-bearing elements become perceptual edges contributing to the overall tension of the architectural object. Glass, for its part, introduces a regime of visual porosity in which the park landscape, the vegetation, and the old facades are continually reflected, producing a form of spatial indeterminacy.
The intervention rejects any pastiche logic or any stylistic continuity with the existing heritage. The project embraces a dialectical relationship between legacy and dissonance. The main house becomes a temporal foundation upon which an architecture of accident, torsion, and geometric displacement is deposited. This confrontation generates a new reading of the domain: an architecture where built memory ceases to be fixed and enters a state of permanent transformation.
Product Spec Sheet
Were your products used?
Join as a manufacturer to add your products.