Jia Little Exhibition Center addressed two central issues – that of architectural building practices, as well as the rise of global industrial complexes, which inevitably results in the increased separation of producer, product, and consumer. Both issues have ramifications on sustainability – the former translates directly to a building’s constructional and operational carbon footprint, while the latter precipitates in an alienated state where consumer goods necessitate massive amounts of energy to be created and delivered to the user.
We live in an age where we are no longer acquainted with the origins and production of the goods we consume, often unwittingly exposed to materials that may be hazardous to our health, or goods that are produced under unfair or exploitative production practices. In pursuing this project, while the primary goal was to establish elegant and practical exhibition spaces, as a responsibility to offer visitors a behind-the-scenes look at the more gritty production houses. One may argue this is exactly what an educated consumer seeks today – to learn about the responsible practices of the manufacturers, the ethics of the designers, the social and environmental responsibility towards the acquisition of the raw materials, the tools of the manufacturing process, and so on.
The project also attempts to critique the state of industrial production in China. The industrial landscape within China tends to be nothing more than large sheds built at a minimum cost, with little consideration for the workers. The design agenda for this project therefore also aimed to generate a more responsible approach toward this very system of production. Exhibition programs have traditionally gone hand in hand with manufacturing and industrial programs in China, and hence the notion of integration with the surroundings must be seen from these programs’ contributions toward the production and consumption cycle itself. The ambition, therefore, was to generate more open and public access to the processes of manufacturing, and in so doing, to empower a community of production workers who are aware that there is a counterpart to their work – a community of educated consumers who seek to know what goes into the designs and goods that are being produced.
This building therefore integrated the display and production spaces of creative industries into a single mixed-use building complex, consisting of an exhibition hall and three work-live atelier buildings. The primary spatial strategy was to create a seamless relationship between spaces of production and consumption, so that visitors and consumers could be reconnected with the knowledge and appreciation of the processes of making and production. It was this form of integration, designed to link up socioeconomic and environmental relationships with that of architecture and its site, which we aimed for in the design; it was an integration that would allow consumers and producers to reject the alienating effects of globalization.
Even though the site is located at the periphery of Shanghai, we recognized that a new kind of space had to be designed for this community. The form and orientation of the exhibition hall was determined by a need to create smaller zones for social interaction and circulation between the atelier buildings, as well as the micro-urbanism of the site. The resultant pockets of landscape and courtyards became social spaces of engagement that could be used by workers, both from the complex and from the traditional neighboring factories, while the bridges allowed for unexpected encounters and shortcuts through the spaces.
While the many programmatic, visual, performative, and circulation criteria for the multi-sided exhibition hall proved challenging, it also gave unique character to the building. Additionally, the timber skin became a key environmental driver and design feature of the new complex. Through its iconicity, the complex has become an attractor for the site.
The exhibition hall was designed in essence to be a horizontal core that is made visible on the exterior through a formally expressive wood cladding and steel framing system. This continuous core attempted to circulate visitors through the four buildings on an elevated level, enveloping the otherwise separate display spaces within the exhibition hall. Weaving through the complex across the bridges into different production studios and fabrication plants, visitors were reoriented at different levels of communicating lobbies and stairs. In other words, the production programs were being held together in the center by the exhibition hall, allowing visitors to reach other spaces without leaving the circuit of exhibition.
The core was stretched and circulation was prolonged through a retail strategy of linear persuasion, weaving visitors through a multitude of spatial experiences – from artificially-lit exhibition interiors to exterior ramped bridges, from sleek exhibitions to design studios and untidy fabrication plants. The experience of the exhibition was therefore rethought through this project, with the hope that a visitor’s experience could be enhanced and authenticated by the connectivity between production and consumption.
A key contribution of this project toward green building practices can be seen in the shading louver details of the exhibition hall’s timber curtain wall. Made from fast-growing sustainable pine wood that was locally treated, the screen produced myriad visual effects within the enclosed spaces, alternately providing shade, or limited views when necessary. The thickened skin responded sensitively to the different kinds of programmatic and thermal requirements of the central building, such as producing deep eave conditions to compensate for larger expanses of glazing where needed, or producing shaded views for office areas. In addition, the screen lowered the thermal gain of exterior walls that were potentially exposed to direct sunlight.
Using limited permutations of the timber louver depth and angles, as many as 12 types were developed to suit different sun angles and orientation. The directionality of the timber curtain wall system of the exhibition hall was not only designed as a continuous surface to promote the legibility of the building as a horizontal core system, it also gave unique possibilities for the control of framed views and sun-shading.
The atelier buildings were designed to contrast with the highly expressive exhibition hall, particularly in their emphasis on verticality and relative simplicity. This vertical thrust of the three ateliers resulted in a vertical window system designed to provide sufficient daylighting and ventilation, while keeping a generally tight thermal envelope through minimum fenestration.
The design also subtly referenced an old courtyard house to the south that the client had restored for the purpose of converting it to an auxiliary arts space. There is a growing trend in the restoration of such historical houses as China’s own rich heritage is being rediscovered after years of official suppression. The spatial complexities of these courtyard dwellings, as well as ideas of transitional spaces, layered views and framed nature were translated to the new exhibition hall. Both cultural spaces share a richness in visual experience, and the timber skin pattern of the new exhibition hall further communicates with the traditional screen (雕花窗) of the restored house.
The Jia Little Exhibition Center is an ambitious project that seeks to address both socioeconomic sustainability, as well as environmental sustainability, while simultaneously commenting on the tendencies of industrial and exhibition architectural design in China. The intervention not only aimed to critique commodity and modes of consumption, it also attempted to reinvent new relationships between the key constituencies that use the space, through newly configured architectural forms and programmatic adjacencies. At the same time, the project also demonstrated the as-yet untapped design possibilities of industrial spaces in a country whose landscape is still dominated by prosaic factory complexes.
The ardent desire to create environmentally sustainable buildings, coupled with budgetary concerns, meant that we had to mine simple building methods for expressive architectural potential, e.g. the curtain wall screen, deep eaves, tight environmental envelope, etc. These technologies were not simply applied to the buildings; they were didactic and become the very character of the architecture. Instead of utilizing technology that was applied, veneer-like, to a building, these passive, low-tech environmental principles were the prime generators of the form and identity of the project.